In the name of ALLAH
What happens in this universe has a scientific reason and the human being sooner or later is going to find the answer and take advantage of it.
In this article, I am going to explain new theories, based on the Relativity theory of Einstein.
The purpose of this article is to solve existing problems in Quantum physics. Problems like time travel (to the past and the future), Twin Paradox, Grandfather Paradox and justifying Gravity (a new explanation of Gravity) and a brief explanation on making anti-gravity.
This article is totally unique and new in its nature, with new theories, subjects and descriptions in the quantum physics. There will be some brief explanations on theories of other scientists for better realization on the subjects.
The level of this article is estimated to upper-mid level and it is expected that the reader is familiar with the doctrines of quantum physics and the Relativity theory.
The article has been translated from Persian-to-English by me (Mohammad Saied Delshad) because of the sensitivity and genuine of the article, so please forgive me if you see any kind of mistake in the typing, grammar or insufficient content.
Foreword
Human being has always been trying to discover the forces and phenomenon around him. Two phenomenons have always kept him thinking, light and time. He has not been able to realize and discover the reality of them until now.
In this article, I am going to give new solutions as theories, to discover the reality of these two phenomenons, so we could open new doors of science and technology to mankind and take the biggest step ever taken into science and what is unknown to us.
This article is the head start for this long journey and hope for a day that we could expand our knowledge about our universe with the help of the theories explained in this article.
What is time?
When we think of time, we tend to think of the ways in which we measure the passing of time, such as a clock or watch, or perhaps a measured interval of time such as an hour or minute, but not of time itself. So what is time? Exactly what is it that we are measuring?
We can begin the answer by saying that we are measuring the interval between two events or use units that are used for that purpose.
But we want to know exactly what the “interval” is.
We always see time as its “flowing”, as if it is going in a smooth and continues motion. But is this view correct?
We talk about time as it flows from the past to the present and in to the future. We have memories form the past, but we don’t have any memories from the future. The time makes us this reference line that events can happen and be saved on it one after the other. At this condition we can understand which event has happened earlier and which event has happened after. This is what makes the so called “arrow of time”. As you can consider, with the main laws of physics, there is no suggestions that tells us time actually flows from past through the present and into the future. So what gives time direction? For better understanding, we take a brief look at thermodynamics.
At levels smaller than an atom, there is no difference between the past and the future!
For instance, if two particles smaller than an atom, interact with each other, they might turn into two new particles and then leave each other. According to the present laws of physics, nothing stands in front of them from interacting again and returning to what they were before the interaction. When studying on these particles, it’s impossible to know the steps of the interaction or even tell if there has been any reaction or not. At this level, it’s impossible to recognize the past from the future.
In the macroscopic world (the world that we can see with naked eyes), we can recognize the arrow of time. If we see a picture of a glass full of water on a table and another picture next to it, showing that the same glass has fell of the table on the ground and the water in it has been spread over the floor, we can certainly realize the steps of the event. We know that bits and pieces of the broken glass can’t get back together again (like humpty dumpty!) and we know that the poured water can’t get back into the glass, But why?
According to the present laws of physics, every reaction has atoms which interact with each other and can return to what they were before the reaction, like the glass or the water on the ground, and can return to what they were before the interaction. But there is a time arrow in this event, which starts from the past and goes into the future. This condition happens when we are in act with complex systems which contain lots of particles. In this kind of situations, we can find out the process of time changing from the past to the future, by analyzing the change in the materials with the help of thermodynamics and related mathematics.
The most fundamental law in physics is the second law of thermodynamics. The law deduced the principle of the increase of entropy and explains the phenomenon of irreversibility in nature.
In other words, in a closed system (our universe is also a closed system), the entropy is always increasing. Things don’t get ordered more than they are. For instance, if you take a box which you have a puzzle in it and shake it hard, after opening it you don’t expect to see the puzzle being made by it. The explanation is simple. The reason the puzzle doesn’t get fixed by itself is that we have only one right state and lots of wrong building states for the puzzle.
Thus, we always get the wrong answer. If we repeat the shaking for a long time, we might get lucky and see the puzzle figured out itself, but that is a one in a million, and in compare to the universe, the universe doesn’t have enough time to do such a thing. So, if we leave the systems that exist in this universe by themselves, they go towards entropy and not ordering, and this gives us the arrow of time.
The other arrow of time is the arrow of the Big-Bang, which we can consider it as the ultimate arrow of time. No matter where or when in the universe that you be, the Big-Bang is always in the past of you. We can see the same arrow in the expansion of the universe. As the universe is aging, getting old and expanding, the galaxies get more far from each other. The ones that are more close to each other show the past and those that are far from each other show the future.
The first law of thermodynamics deduced the amount of energy in a closed system is always constant. The total amount of energy of the universe has been calculated and given to it at the time of its creation, but the second law of thermodynamics tells us that the “useful” energy is running out. When all the stars and all the energy sources run out, the universe goes into a stable warmth status and at that position nothing changes.
What did we learn from studying the laws of thermodynamics in relevance to the arrow of time?
We learned that the reason that reactions in a sub-atomic system can turn back and in macroscopic systems can’t go back (the arrow of time is in one direction from the past to the future) is because of the entropy of the universe, which is a constant law for the universe; but it can be connived in sub-atomic levels. So, we can have a conclusion that time is floating in one direction in the macroscopic world, which is from the past to the future, which we will consider more about it later on.
If we take two atomic clocks and put them next together and we set there times so they show the exact time, we know that if they even Tick-Tock for years, they will still show the same time. But if we separate them and put one on the planet earth and send the other one to a “trip around the world”, when it gets back from the trip, we see that it shows short lack of time than the clock which was on planet earth. That’s right, traveling around the world really keeps you young! This is not just a theory, actual experiments have been done and they have confirmed this theory. What is going on here? We can find the answer to this question in the theory of relativity, because this theory tells us that the faster a matter goes, tell less time it experiences, until the time gets to zero at the speed of light. This event is called “time dilation” and is not perceptible but it is more perceptible in higher speeds. An example for “time dilations” that we are familiar with is if we consider an astronaut who is living for a year on the international space station, will have a 0.0085 seconds “time dilation” compared to us living on the earth, which isn’t perceptible.
We have to consider that high speed or going near the speed of light doesn’t infect the clock, but it actually slows down time.
We have to notice that amount of time dilation has direct relation with the speed of the observer, but another thing to consider is gravity (which we are going to talk about soon on what exactly is gravity). High gravitational fields, like those near black holes, make time pass quicker.
For answering the main question that “Do we have a constant universal time?” the answer is expressly No.
The only thing we must consider is that we all experience time in different ways which is based on our speed and the gravitational field that we are in.
Space-time with a supplementary definition
Until this part of the article we had a brief review on time, and the subjects explained where based on scientists researches and theories like Einstein. At this part we are going to have a brief review on Einstein’s explanation of space-time and we are going to complete it with new theories so we could answer some of the questions which are without answer in quantum physics.
Consider that from this part on to the end of this article, all the subjects and theories are new and they haven’t been mentioned before and they will be expressed with short details.
Newton says that whenever two matters come next together, a force called gravity will attract the smaller object to the bigger object; this force is straight from the center of the bigger matter to the center of the smaller matter. And then came in Einstein, and gave out the space-time theory in relativity. He said that every thing is set in a space mixed with time. The more the mass of the matter, the more the space-time around it bends. He said if we consider a matter on earth, why it has to be pulled down by gravity, maybe it’s being pushed down from above! He said everything in the universe is floating in a so called space-time, the more the mass of the matter, the more it bends the sheet of space-time (of course, if we consider space-time as two dimensions) and the rest of matters near it fall down towards the bigger matter.
As we know, this theory (space- time taking place of Newton’s gravity) has been approved with different scientific experiments (like the light shift experiment at a solar eclipse and etc).
What we want to add to this theory and complete it is that every particle in this universe has its own space-time and it’s not floating in the universes space-time. Of course, after considering the universe in a single thought, we get to the same module of the floating space-time of the universe, which is because of the space-time of the particles the make up the universe and which make a united space-time, but it actually isn’t a single space-time and in a smaller view, each matter has its own space-time wrapped around it. The more the matter has mass, the more the space-time around it will curve and have more gravity. Particles getting mixed together, their space-time will combine with each other and make a united bigger space-time (the meant of particle is the any small particle that has been discovered by the human being or even not been discovered, in ether the microscopic world or the macroscopic world).
The mass and the curve of space-time around particles can be calculated by the atomic mass of its building atoms with mathematical equations. The only thing remained from classical physics about gravity in this theory is the strait being of gravity.
We have to consider that if particles with different atomic mass combine together, the total space-time of the particle will be the space-time of the particles with more curved space-time and more mass and the final particle will have a united space-time.
The other thing that should be considered is that each matter has its own space-time, and no particle can have less than its own space-time or remove it. The only way to decrease a matter’s space-time would be to change its nature, and by doing that, the new matter (with new space-time) isn’t the old matter and it has changed into something completely different.
As we said, if a matter takes place in a more curved and compressed space-time, the space-time with more compressed space-time will be the main space-time, but if the matter goes in a space-time with less compression than its own space-time, the matter’s space-time will not decrease (even if the lower compressed space-time has a bigger sphere) and it will remain having its own more compressed space-time.
The next thing to consider is that, if a matter with more compression of space-time enters a matter with less compression of space-time, the maximum influence of the matter with more compression of space-time on the other matter, would be approximately the same size of its self. Meaning if 1 grams of a more compressed space-time matter enters a 10 kg of lower compression space-time matter, it can only influence 1 grams of the other matter and not more.
A matter with more compressed space-time around it, experiences more time than a matter with less compression of space-time around it.
Four types of matter, four types of gravity and anti-gravity
In the past, our ancestors use to know our world by four kind of matter, Earth, Water, Wind and Fire.
In this section we are going to explain our universe with the help the new theories with these four types of matter.
We all know these four types of matter, which are: Solid (Earth), Liquid (Water), air (Wind) and Plasma (Fire, Ether, Plasma, Dark Energy and etc).
In the past sections we talked about space-time and we said the more a matter has mass the more it would have a compressed and curved space-time around it. According to this sentence we can have a conclusion that we have 4 types of general space-time.
Solids have the most compressed and curved space-time and plasma has the less.
Thus, we have to consider that light doesn’t have any space-time, because it doesn’t have any mass, and space-time comes out with mass.
At this part we will have a new look at gravity and what exactly it is.
According to past theories about gravity, both Einstein and Newton, knew gravity as some kind of force which pulls everything down or pushes everything down.
Now, we want to say that there is no such thing as a gravitational force! In other words, gravity is a justification for what we now call space-time!
There are four kinds of general matter in the universe with different space-times, which build up the accordingly gravity. If you go near a big matter, you will be pulled towards it, which we call gravity. The liquids have less gravity, so they can move more freely in respect to solids. Gases also have less gravity than liquids, so they’re a little freer. And at the end we have plasma, which is the type of matter with the less gravity in the whole universe. A realizable sample of plasma around us would be fire.
Let’s clarify what we said with a simple example. If we take a bottle and put some sand in it, and some water on it and put the rest of it empty (filled with air) and close its lid and shake it well, after putting it somewhere for a while, we can see that the sand goes to the bottom, on it the water and at the top the air. As we can see in this simple example, particles with different space-times separate from each other and particles with same space-times settle next to each other. If we do this experiment in any part of the universe, we will get the same result, with a slight difference in the time it takes which is related to the space- time compression of the place we do the experiment; for example doing this experiment in space takes a longer time, and doing it in a compressed space-time place, takes less time.
The main thing that happens in this experiment returns to the entropy of the universe. The bottle is known as a closed system, and its entropy goes to the level that it reaches equilibration. In this system, the equilibration is based on full separation of particles with different space-times. Particles with less space-time compression can go around faster, there for they try to get rid of this position. At the same time they don’t like to be combined with particles with other compression of space-time, there for they try to get far from this position. The result of this experiment will be what we always see in this kind of experiment. In this situation we can see that separation of particles is base on difference in space-times, not gravity.
Now we get back to planet earth. The same thing happens on planet earth. At the center we have earth, water on it, then air and at least plasma.
Have you ever thought when you throw something it falls on the ground? Why do liquids flow on the ground? Why do gases go up by themselves? Have you ever thought how high could gases go up in the sky? Have you ever considered that they go up and stay at a certain place in the sky? Have you ever considered why we don’t use air for sending a rocket to space, and instead we use fire? In the following section we try to answer these questions with the help of the new theories.
We’ll start our discussion with gas. As we said earlier all the matters in this universe like to go towards disordering, so if we for example fill a balloon with hydrogen and let it go, it will go up in the sky and settle levitating up there in a certain place. The main reason for this effect is not gravity or anti-gravity, but the main reason for this reaction is because of tendency to disordering and the second reason is that it would not like to be attracted by matters with other types of space-time. Now, if it was because of anti-gravity, and if we consider gravity as described by Newton or even Einstein, the gas has to be able to go higher, but it wouldn’t go higher. The reason is that the region of gas is there and it cannot go into regions of lighter space-times which is plasma in this place, which its reason is the same reason we explained for gases and more compressed space-times, which we see it acts also vice-versa. The plasma will not let the gas to come into the region with lower compression of space-time.
Now that we considered this example, let’s discuss plasma and how does a rocket go into space, now that we don’t have any kind of gravitational forces as known from earth towards matters.
For this part, we also start with an example. We have a rocket which we have filled it up with some kind of fuel and it’s ready for takeoff. The reason it has weight is because the rocket is a solid matter and the type of space-time of the rocket is the same as earth (approximately). Thus, according to what we said earlier, the more the atomic mass of the particles of the matters, the more it will weigh, because its main place is in its own space-time region (the earth) and not in the region of airs space-time (the atmosphere). Now we want to send the rocket to space. The first thing that comes to mind is the necessary force to take over the gravity. As we said, the gravity doesn’t have its past definition anymore and has a new definition, so we have to find a new solution for our problem.
At this section we have to consider a new principle. If we want to take a matter with compressed space-time to a region with less compression of space-time, we have to have a “transporter”. The transporter has to be a matter from the less compressed space-time region and “weighing” more than the matter that is going to be transported so it could take it to its space-time region.
In our example, the transporter is the fire outputted form the rocket at takeoff. Perhaps we use to explain a rocket takeoff in classical physics as the output fire of the rocket makes a force opposite of the gravity of earth, which makes it take over the gravitational field and go up. Why do we use fire? Why don’t we use air? If the main reason is to take over the gravity of earth (according to classical physics), why don’t we use the force of air?
Anyway, whatever explanation that it could have is only going to be without problems until it goes out of the atmosphere, but we know that the rocket can still go through space with the force of fire. How does classical physics explain this issue?
Let’s leave answering these questions to you and we get to our story and exploring it with the new theories. As we said, after firing the rocket, the mass of the output fire has to have more mass than the rocket at each moment. In this situation the output fire (which is plasma), likes to go towards disordering. The space-time towards earth is a more compressed space-time, so the fire wants to get out of this situation and goes the other direction, which is towards the sky and space. Because the rocket is in the fires way in going up, it has to take it with itself and the output fire would be the transporter and the rocket will be the matter being transported. As you can consider we are not talking about any classical physics force, but in fact we are just focusing on disordering of matters.
Consider that if the mass of the output fire in any moment gets lesser than the mass of the rocket, the space-time of the rocket and its disordering native will take over and they will change their place and the rocket will turn in to the transporter and will return to the ground. If the mass of both of them gets the same amount, the rocket will levitate at its place and will not go up or down. At the end, if the mass of the fire gets more than the rocket, it will guide the rocket to space. Consider that we didn’t use any kind of force in our equations and we could predict the conclusion and we can even say that the output force is equal to the mass of the output fire. Another thing that we must consider is that, the more massive the transporter, the speedier it could go.
There for, according to the explained theories, we don’t need any kind of force for getting out of the space-time of earth. If we could have a matter (transporter) with more mass than the matter we want to send out to space, then we have achieved our goal and we can use it to send the matter out to space.
Another thing that we have to consider is that, if we could (somehow) halter the output fire of the rocket in one moment (or something familiar with the same space-time property), and put it in some kind of box, then we don’t need to use a lot of fuel for sending the rocket to space, we can use that box for sending the rocket to space. For better consideration, imagine a balloon that we fill it with warm air, this time we fill it with the output fire of the rocket (the invisible part of the fire, the actual fire) so we could go out to space. Of course, such a thing is not possible with our main science and technology, but with the help of the new theories, in a short future, hopefully we could achieve this situation.
Now we get to this part that when the rocket gets to the space-time of plasma, how it goes forward with its output fire. We follow up with a new theory that every matter can go freely in its own space-time in any direction. In this theory we have to add that the more the space-time is compressed, the less the particles can go freely in it. Of course there still is the need of the transporter, but form the same space- time. There for, the rocket can still continue its way with the help of its output fire. Now if we think about the situations with the help of the new theories, we see that other types of matter also follow these rules.
Time travel or space-time bending
Human being has always been looking for a way for traveling through time and going to the past or to the future. But is time traveling really possible?
In this part we will take a look at theories about time traveling and if it’s possible to time travel or not. According to the present laws of physics, there is no law saying we can’t travel through time, so scientists have different theories for time traveling. According to Einstein’s theory of relativity, light always has a constant speed, which has been approved, but they don’t exactly know why. That’s why they say in high speeds like near the speed of light, time extends and until at the speed of light, it gets to zero, so it doesn’t have any time. This experiment has been examined in different ways and it has been approved to be true. But what is exactly going on?
According to the new theories in this article, each particle has its own relative space-time around it, so the time of each particle is different and relevant to itself. But because all the matters in this universe are created of similar fundamental particles (such as atoms, electrons, protons, neutrons, quarks and etc), they would have similar space-times, but when they get together and make a more complex matter and participate in more compressed space-times, they can increase their relevant space-time and experience the new more compressed space-time (as discussed earlier). Consider that as we said, no particle can decrease its own space-time and can’t experience a lower compressed space-time than its relevant space-time, unless it changes its identity, which in that case it’s not the first matter anymore and it has turned into a completely new matter. With consideration on this point we can easily notice that a particle cannot experience the speed of light, because the particle that goes at the speed of light, doesn’t have any space-time and if a particle (except for the light itself) goes at the speed of light, it will change its identity and will no longer be the past matter.
Now if we want to think that the human being can go at the speed of light, we see that according to the new theories it’s impossible. If it could any how go at that speed, it wouldn’t be a human anymore, it will change identity and it will turn into something else. So what about time traveling? According to what we said, space-time is relevant and so there is no constant space-time for taking over. Like radioactive particles which have a relevant mid-age and by experiencing different space-times, they experience lower mid-ages (according to the new theories, they can’t experience lighter space-time than their own space-time), time is also relevant to the matter. We can’t separate relevant space-time from any matter and every matter is created and combined with space and time (four dimensions). So in one look, we cannot time travel. But is there any way of going through time or at least seeing through time? We will cover up this question in the following section.
- Traveling to the future or going to the past, which one is possible
As we said time isn’t a separate thing so we could look or talk about it separately from the matter or over take it by itself. At this part this question comes to mind that what solution is there for time traveling. According to the exposed theories, there would be one way of time traveling, which we actually can’t call it time traveling and which we could actually just see another time.
First of all let me tell you that going to the future is impossible, because the space-time of a matter is approximately until now and the future space-time of the matter hasn’t been created yet. So it’s impossible to travel or even see the future. What about the past?
As we said, we can’t travel through time but we could somehow see the past. For such a view we could place the observer in a more compressed space-time region. In this situation, the space-time of the observer will get more curved, so if we could curve it enough, we could see the past. In this situation we can consider that the observer is seeing the past.
As we know, what we see in the universe is based on lights of stars which belong to the past of the universe. We could make a tool so it would bend space-time and when we see through that tool, we could see a time of space near to the present time of that location and the more we bend space-time, the more we get close to observe the present time of the location, but the maximum bending of space-time would be to see the present time of that location and not more and as we decrease the compression of space-time, we get back to our current view, which is the past of that location.
Any ways, we always have our relative space-time with us and we will always experience a so called passing of time which we can’t stop it or get out of it in any kind, and the most of the thing we could do is to bend the space-time around us and change our view of the universe.
- Solving the Twin Paradox with the help of the new theories
We all know the twin paradox well and there is no need to explain it again. If we take a look at this paradox with the help of the new theories, we see that there would be no paradoxes. One of the twins is living on earth and there for is influenced by the space-time of earth, while the other twin is traveling around the world and the maximum space-time for the traveler twin would be its own space-time (because it cannot lose its own space-time). In this situation, the twin that is going around the world is experiencing the right and natural time passing, while the other twin is on earth and is experiencing a more compressed space-time, which is earth’s space-time, there for it experiences more time than the other twin. The person going around the world, is aging naturally as it has been defined for its nature of its body, while the other person who is living on earth is experiencing more time and aging faster than the other one. Then the person on ground is experiencing more time than it should experience naturally.
- Solving the Grandfather Paradox with the help of the new theories
We all know this paradox very well too and the situation is completely clear and there is no need to explain it any more. According to the new theories, when going back to time has been obsolete, the explained situation in this paradox never happens, there for there is no need to talk about such a situation anymore.
Does light always go at a constant speed?
According to experiments for checking the speed of light shows that light moves at a constant speed in any situation. Explanation of this subject is outside the bounds of this article, there for we continue as that you know about the subject. But how does this subject get explained with the help of the new theories.
At this section we must express a new theory. Light doesn’t have any space-time, so it cannot enter the space-time, there for the light goes between space-times and not in them. If it could go between the space-times of a matter’s particle, then it goes through it, else if the matter has a compressed space-time and it couldn’t go through it (like turbid solid), light reflects form the surface of the matter.
Light doesn’t have space-time, there for we can’t define speed for it (which is a property based on space-time). So how can we measure the speed of light? Light goes between space-times of matters, with any speed (zero speed), which means light is present anywhere, anytime. But when it reaches a matter which has space-time, it reacts with the space-time of the matter and releases something called light with constant speed and a property with two kind that could be observed as a wave or as an particle (photon) which has entered the space-time region and we can measure it.
What we see and call light, isn’t actually the light that goes between space-times, but it’s a matter which is made when light strikes a space-time. In the next part we will take a look at experiments done for realization of the nature of time and its speed and we will try to explain it with the help of the new theories.
- Explanation of the static observer, the traveling observer and the strike of light
We all know this experiment. This experiment says that for example if a train is moving we have an observer in the train and an observer in the train station.
When the train reaches the station, two flashlights strike the front and the end of the train at the same time. The observer who is at the train station observes this phenomenon as it strikes the front and back at the same time. But the observer on the train has to see the front strike before the back strike (according to classical physics), because according to classical physics the speed of light has to be decreased or increased by the speed of light.
But the thing we have to consider is that the moving observer also observes both strikes at the same time!
The only explanation present physics has about this phenomenon is that light always has a constant speed. But how can we explain this phenomenon with the help of the new theories?
As you read in the new theories, light doesn’t have any speed and when it enters the observer’s space-time, it starts to go at the constant speed. At this part we can say that, the start of the observation starts as the light enters the space-time of the observer’s eye. In this example, light strikes two ends of the train at the same time and then it continues to its path to the eyes of the observer. At this time it strikes the eyes of the observer and changes identity and enters the region of space-time. At this time, the so called light starts to have a constant speed and goes until the observer sees or feels the light, which this is the part which we can measure the speed of light. Because the eyes of the observer are constant related to the observer, there for the observer sees both strikes at the same time.
What do we see (the hair or the curve of the hair?!)
At this part we can mention a question that what exactly do we see?
Einstein said that we see the shadow of objects and we don’t actually see the object. Now we want to complete and correct this theory with the help of new theories. What we want to say is that “we can see the space-time of an object, not the actual object”. In this situation, light strikes the space-time of an object (our eye or whatever observer) and changes identity and we actually see it. What we see of objects isn’t the actual object but it’s the curve of the space-time of the object and we can’t see the object in any circumstances.
Can an object go at the speed of light?
The next question that comes to mind is that can an object move at the speed of light? Based on the theories of present physics, there is no limit to it, but if an object reaches the speed of light, it’s not anymore the past object and it turns into another type of matter or turns into light (if it could)? For better consideration, let’s have a simpler example. We said that fire (Plasma) has the least space-time. If an object wants to have the space-time of fire what should it do? Well, it has to burn! But by burning does it turn into fire or does it just change identity?
The reason that it will not turn into fire and (usually) turns into carbon is that the space-time of the object is more compressed than the space-time of fire and it can’t turn into something with less compression of space-time. We have the same circumstances for light. An object may get to a situation which could shine, but could it turn into light?
Justification for the wave-particle property of light
The most complex phenomenon in this universe is light. Because as we read, light doesn’t have space-time, thus we could never realize its reality. The only thing we could realize about light is its effect on objects with space-time around us and based on the effects we can recognize the light. Light isn’t a matter, so matter can never understand a phenomenon that isn’t a matter.
Many experiments have been made for realizing the reality of light. The results of this experiments show that light has a wave-particle property, which is based on the view of the observer.
At this section we try to realize the reality of light (of course we can never do this completely).
What I’m going to say in this section is based on the new theories and it actually interprets the effects of light not the actual phenomenon of light.
We all know the experiment of “light and the two slots”, which is used for interpreting the phenomenon of light. This experiment shows that light comes in different types (wave or photon) based on the circumstances of the observer (eyes, light testing tools or etc), light shows itself as a wave or photon, which it could have both types of property at the same time.
What we can say based on the explained theories is that light doesn’t have any space-time so we could realize what it is. Based on what we said, what we see is also based on the observer. The observer (the wave sensor or the photon sensor) specifies the light as it expects.
The question that comes to mind at this section is that does light have only a bipolar property of wave and photon? The straight answer is No. these two types are the types that we have discovered for matter. If one day we find another type of property for matters and we try to recognize light with that tool, we would find that light will turn into that type for the observation tool. Observing light in different types (as observer expects) is because the light changes identity when it reaches the observers space-time and turns into what the observer expects.
Conclusion
In this article we had new theories in the field of quantum physics and the reality of light which were expressed for the first time. Unsolved problems like the Twin Paradox, the Grandfather Paradox, time travel, gravity, bipolar property of light and etc were described and new solutions was expressed for each problem. The main aim of these theories was to know our universe better and find solutions for mentioned and unmentioned problems and look at the universe with a different look. Hope this article would be the head start of the evolution of science and we see bigger gains in the field of quantum physics and other sciences.
